You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 4 Univariate test results for simple main effect analyses of age category on selected dependent variables which showed significant interactions for each level of playing standard

From: Anthropometric, physiological characteristics and rugby-specific game skills of schoolboy players of different age categories and playing standards

SCRuM test variableaMean diff (95% CI)Playing standardDfMSFPbη2p
Running-and-Catching Ability Skill Test (au)2.27 (1.49–3.05)Elite group1105.47633.272< 0.0000.18
5.15 (4.32–5.97)Sub-elite group1480.645151.619< 0.0000.50
Tackling Proficiency Test (%)4.89 (1.22–8.54)Elite group1487.86.94< 0.0090.04
16.5 (12.6–20.4)Sub-elite group14846.468.9< 0.0000.31
Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 (m)198.5 (168.3–288.7)Elite group1808,043.918.8< 0.0000.09
413.0 (316.3–509.7)Sub-elite group13,042,135.770.9< 0.0000.26
155.4 (38.4–272.4)Non-Rugby group1294,145.56.860.010.03
2-kg Medicine Ball Chest Throw Test (m)2.26 (1.81–2.71)Elite group1104.799.6< 0.0000.33
2.41 (1.93–2.88)Sub-elite group1105.1100.4< 0.0000.34
1.34 (0.77–1.92)Non-Rugby group122.021.0< 0.0000.09
Vertical Jump test (cm)9.52 (7.99–11.0)Elite group11708.5140.0< 0.0000.41
7.69 (6.05–9.32)Sub-elite group11053.986.2< 0.0000.30
11.8 (9.87–13.8)Non-Rugby group11857.7152.0< 0.0000.43
  1. aMean diff = mean differences in the dependent variable between U19 and 16 (Under 19-Under 16) based on estimated marginal means; MS = Mean square; df = degree of freedom; badjusted for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni correction; η2p = partial eta squared; F = each F tests the simple effects of Age category within each level combination of playing standard. These tests are based on the linearly independent pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal means; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval for the mean difference